Continue.dev vs Cody by Sourcegraph
Which is better in 2025? An honest breakdown.
Cody by Sourcegraph
AI coding assistant with your entire codebase as context
Expert's Verdict
Cody by Sourcegraph wins overall with a 4.2/5 rating vs Continue.dev's 4.1/5. But the right choice depends on your specific situation.
Choose Continue.dev if:
- ✓ developers who want LLM flexibility
- ✓ teams using Claude or local models
- ✓ privacy-conscious developers
Choose Cody by Sourcegraph if:
- ✓ engineers at large companies
- ✓ teams with massive codebases
- ✓ onboarding new developers
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Continue.dev | Cody by Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.1/5 | ⭐ 4.2/5 |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Free Tier | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Best For | developers who want LLM flexibility, teams using Claude or local models | engineers at large companies, teams with massive codebases |
| Avoid If | non-technical users | solo developers with small projects |
| Top Use Case | bring-your-own-model | codebase-qa |
What is Continue.dev?
Continue.dev is an open-source VS Code and JetBrains extension that acts as a universal AI coding layer. You configure it to use any LLM — Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Mistral, or local models via Ollama — and get inline completions, chat with highlighted code, codebase-aware Q&A, and slash commands. Unlike locked-in tools, you control the model, the context, and the cost.
What is Cody by Sourcegraph?
Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant that uses the entire Sourcegraph code intelligence platform as context. Unlike tools that only see your open files, Cody can search across all your repositories, understand symbol definitions across microservices, and answer questions like 'which services consume this API?' or 'where is this function called in production?' It supports Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini as underlying models.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Continue.dev better than Cody by Sourcegraph?
Cody by Sourcegraph scores higher overall (4.2/5 vs 4.1/5). Kills it for large-codebase navigation. If you've ever asked 'where is X implemented?' across 500k LOC, Cody earns its place. Overkill for small projects.
What is the main difference between Continue.dev and Cody by Sourcegraph?
Continue.dev is designed for developers who want LLM flexibility and teams using Claude or local models, while Cody by Sourcegraph excels for engineers at large companies and teams with massive codebases.
Which is cheaper — Continue.dev or Cody by Sourcegraph?
Continue.dev is free and has a free tier. Cody by Sourcegraph is freemium and has a free tier.
Want the Full AI Tools Breakdown?
Join 80,000+ entrepreneurs learning how to pick and use AI tools effectively.
Join Free Community →